Today’s sermon is brought to you by the makers of Viagra, Trojans and Southern Comfort. Between the three of them, you are certain to safely go where no man over 45 was probably meant to go.
Today, I’m gonna talk about sin. What is sin, and who gets to decide? Webster defines sin the noun as one of three things, a transgression of theological principles, a shameful offense or an estrangement from God. Sin as a transitive verb is defined as to knowingly do wrong or to commit a shameful offense, such as to live in sin. Reading those definitions, I would conclude that sin is going to be different for each person, for each religion, as a transgression of theological principles will be different with each religion, a shameful offense will be different, and an estrangement from God will depend on who you define God to be. My sins will be different from your sins. A Jewish person might think its sinful to eat a cheeseburger, because that is a transgression of theological principles. A Muslim might think the same about a woman going out in public with her head uncovered. A Hindu would be sinning to eat meat.
On the other hand, is sin not a little simpler than even Webster defines? Is it not a sin to simply cause harm to another person? Is that not the real teaching of most religions? It is my belief that the only sin we commit is when we break the golden rule. If we treat other people in a manner contrary to how we would want to be treated, it’s a sin.
That’s why its sinful to steal. Or lie. Or murder. Or commit adultery. I don’t do ANY of those.
Some of the other sins, I take issue with.
As long as I treat other people in a kind and respectful manner, am free from sin? Take lustful thoughts. I admit, I have an abundance of those. They invade many, many of my waking moments, more than a 45 year old woman should ever admit to. But does it cause anyone any harm? Are those thoughts, in and of themselves, sinful?
If I am honest, trustworthy, kind and considerate, am I free of sin?
Or…by virtue of being alive, am I honor bound to be a sinner?
I like Betty. I think she’s funny, and kind, and a person I am always seeking to know better. A kinder heart, a more generous heart, you would have a hard time finding. Is she perfect? God no. She’s late for everything, she has an absurd sense of her own importance, and sometimes, she’s just plain a big show off. But is she a sinner? Does she transcend theological principles? Depends on the theology. Does she commit shameful offenses? None that she is ashamed of. She lives her life as if it could be printed on the front page every day. Not that others wouldn’t think some of what she does is shameful, but she’s comfortable with it. Depends on the theology. Is she estranged from God? Lord, no. God walks with her, asks her advice, gives it pretty freely, too. Shows his pleasure with her every time she looks outside her window to admire her flowers, or watches her boys sleeping.
Betty’s not a sinner. She follows her heart, which admittedly, she wears on her sleeve. Dangles it there, actually, which is not very smart, but is certainly not a sin. Sin is over rated. Save it for the people who deserve it. Those who intentionally pollute rivers, and exploit poor folks, and think that business is business and there is no place for conscience in the workplace. Save it for the drug dealers, and con artists, and those who prey on the weak. Save it for the politicians who barter lives for wealth or who line their pockets with the sweat and blood of their constituents.
Save it for those who have no compassion for other’s pain. For those of us who do treat others as we would have others treat ourselves, I’ll take a pass on the guilt.
This blog was not meant to offend, but is simply a reaction to thinking about sin all day today. I ask no one’s forgiveness. I own these thoughts, but do not project these thoughts as applicable to anyone else. I sit not in judgment of others who think differently.